Skip to content
FingerBrowser
All antidetect browsers

Comparison

Incogniton vs DICloak

Prices, free plans, platforms and what users report about each, side by side. Compiled from public reviews and forums, not our own testing.

Last checked October 10, 2026

The main differences

  • DICloak’s free plan includes more profiles: 5 vs 3.
  • DICloak is cheaper to start: $8/mo vs $19.99/mo.
  • Only DICloak runs on Linux.
  • Only DICloak lists mobile profiles.
  • Users rate Incogniton 4.6/5 (209 reviews) and DICloak 4.7/5 (61 reviews).

Side by side

Features Incogniton DICloak
Cheapest paid plan $19.99/mo $8/mo
Free plan 3 profiles 5 profiles
Platforms Windows, macOS Windows, macOS, Linux
Mobile app No No
Browser engine Chromium Chromium
Interface languages English, 中文, Français, Español, Português English, 中文, Español, Português
Team access
API
Automation
Mobile profiles No
Cloud sync
Proxy tools
Review score 4.6/5 (209 reviews) 4.7/5 (61 reviews)

What users say

Incogniton

Read with caution

Feedback is mostly positive about ease of use, the free tier, free built-in proxies and responsive support, mainly from small-scale users. Negatives center on detection or bans on stricter platforms and occasional IP leaks.

What users like

Easy to useGenerous free planHelpful supportGood valueHandy proxy tools

What users complain about

Ban reportsExpensive

DICloak

Read with caution

The reviews available are overwhelmingly positive and mostly praise quick, hands-on support, along with built-in RPA automation and team account sharing. Independent feedback is scarce, however: most forum posts come from the vendor, and no recurring complaint could be verified yet.

What users like

Helpful supportGood for teamsStrong automationEasy to use

What users complain about

Not enough independent reports yet.

Antidetect browsers are used to run several accounts side by side, for ad verification and for privacy. Using them to break a platform’s rules can still get accounts banned.